lunes, 28 de febrero de 2022

LA REVOLUCION CONSERVADORA COMO DIAGNOSIS CLINICA DIGNA DE UN GREGORY HOUSE

 

"There is yet another, and very interesting, type of conservatism. It is usually referred to as the Conservative Revolution, and it dialectically links conservatism with modernism. This trend was adopted by Martin Heidegger, Ernst and Friedrich Jünger, Carl Schmitt, Oswald Spengler, Werner Sombart, Othmar Spann, Friedrich Hielscher, Ernst Niekisch, and others.

The philosophical paradigm of the conservative revolutionary stems from the general conservative view of the world as an objective process of degradation, which reaches its peak with modernism (a view shared by traditionalism). But, unlike the traditionalists, conservative revolutionaries think: why does God, who created this world, ultimately turn a blind eye to evil, and why do God’s enemies win? One might suspect that the beautiful Golden Age, which fundamental conservatives defend, already contained a gene that brought about this degradation. Then the conservative revolutionaries say to the fundamental conservatives: ‘You propose to go back to the state when man only suffered from the initial symptoms of the illness, a hacking cough, and talk about how well-off man was back then, when

today this same man is on his deathbed. You merely contrast a coughing man with a dying man. Conservative revolutionaries want to find out how the infection itself originated and why the man started to cough...’ ‘We believe’, the conservative revolutionaries say, ‘in God and in Providence. But we think the original source, God Himself, the Divine Source, contains the intention to organise this eschatological drama.’ With this vision, modernism acquires a paradoxical character. It is not just an illness of today’s world, but a discovery in today’s world of a phenomenon which began to take root in the very same past that is so dear to traditionalists. Modernism is not improved as a result of this realisation by the conservative revolutionaries, while tradition loses its decisive positivity.

The basic formula of the Conservative Revolutionary Arthur Moeller van den Bruck is, ‘The conservatives used to try to stop the revolution, but now we must lead it.’ It means that in joining, modernism’s destructive tendencies, in part out of pragmatism, one must identify and recognise the germ that served as the initial cause of its destructive tendencies —namely, modernism itself. Then the conservative must carefully and permanently root it out of existence and, in doing so, bring about God’s secret, parallel, additional, and subtle design. The conservative revolutionaries want not only to slow time down as do liberal conservatives or to go back to the past like raditionalists, but to tear out the root of all evil in the world’s fundamental structure."


(uno de los momentos más sembraos del duginiano PUTIN VS PUTIN)




sábado, 19 de febrero de 2022

BREVE TRAVESURA ILUSTRADAMENTE OSCURA


Cuantas/os/es más asesorOs/as/es no binaries/as/os acumula Biden, cuanto más se wachoskiza su Administración, más presuntos aliados parecen buscar la puerta que dice EXIT y más atracción parece emanar de Moscú y Pekín. ¿Estamos pasando de la GEOpolítica a algo más glandular, a impulsos más profundos de rechazo y/o atracción, a una ENDOCRINOpolítica? Igual habría que darle a la ouija y consultar al doctor Marañón (sí, ya saben, el incorrectísimo prologuista de la edición castellana de CORYDON de Andre Gide y autor de la psicoautopsia no menos incorrecta de Enrique IV de Trastamara). Están pasando cosas impensables no ha demasiado tiempo en el campo de las relaciones internacionales que parecen trascender las interpretaciones más convencionalmente políticas para abrir perspectivas de elucidación más raciovitales. Son tiempos decisivos, que diría Spengler, y los tiempos decisivos, pues eso, es lo que tienen...